<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Piper Owner Society Forums</title>
    <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/index</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:07:57 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:07:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>Piper Owner Society Forums</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.25</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Carpets</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143576/143576#msg-143576</link>
      <author>flyguydon</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Who makes the best carpet kit for the best price?  I have seen Airtex and it seems pretty good.  Is there a better choice that is not 2 or 3 times the $$ ?]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143576/143576#msg-143576</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:07:57 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: IFR Training</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143575#msg-143575</link>
      <author>Jim Wells</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Sorry Ed, but I can't agree with you on communications and navigation justifying logging IFR time.  The elephant in the room is doing that while flying only on what you are seeing on your instruments.  I try to fly precise navigation and certainly communications when IFR on top and VFR.  It is a hell of a lot easier than when flying in clouds.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143575#msg-143575</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:45:10 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143574#msg-143574</link>
      <author>Dave Matlock</author>
      <description><![CDATA[&quot;By the way, what else is in your map pocket that can contaminate the strainers? Dirty Rags? Cracker wrappers? Lint? Dust? Cookie Crumbs?&quot;<br />
<br />
Well let's see, since dirty rags, cracker wrappers, cats, and water balloons are thrown out the storm window and lint, dust, and cookie crumbs are stored between the seat back and bottom cushions the only thing I have to put in that particular map pocket are a few quick start avionics instruction sheets, some check lists, and a Ziploc bag with pink strainers but thanks for asking.<br />
<br />
let's look at this:<br />
<br />
&quot;So, if you drain and replace 8 ounces of fuel, YOU’VE SAVED 16 CENTS! YAY!&quot;. <br />
<br />
You weren't talking about what made sense, you were talking about what made cents! does that technique EVER work out for you?  You know the one I mean, trying to divert attention away from one stupid thing by saying another?  What an insecure childhood you must've had.<br />
<br />
Oh, and for ANOTHER definitive answer, the PA28-235 POH simply states &quot;drain fuel tank sumps&quot;.<br />
<br />
(Everyone all together now)  &quot;The village called and they want their idiot back&quot;.  Now run along.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143574#msg-143574</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:01:28 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143573#msg-143573</link>
      <author>PilotPete</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I thought one of the key attributes of a good pilot is a good sense of judgement.  Why would you blindly follow instructions in the POH when they don't make alot of sense?  You have to understand what the POH is.<br />
<br />
The POH is a CYA document for the a/c manufacturer.  He doesn't want to get sued by the idiot who has an accident caused by contaminated fuel, but who put the contaminated sumped fuel back into his own tank.  Getting rid of it is all the manuf can suggest.  It's just another example of the POH being targetted at the lowest common denominator.  I believe in Darwinism - if you're stupid enough to put crappy fuel in your tank, then you don't deserve to pass on your genes.<br />
<br />
As a pilot, you make hundreds of assessments before, during and after every flight that potentially affect your safety.  Checking the fuel for contamination and reusing it if it's OK is just one of those judgement calls.  If you think the fuel that you just sumped isn't fit to go back into your tank, then shouldn't you question the fuel that's still IN the tank?  Cause that's where the crap you just threw away  came from!]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143573#msg-143573</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:57:29 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143572#msg-143572</link>
      <author>oil man</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Doesn't pouring it back into the tank interrupt the space / time continuum? Might throw the earth out of balance too. Better not pour it back into the tank or the plane won't reach 88 feet per second and the flux capacitor will short out....]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143572#msg-143572</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:52:49 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Modifications] Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143571#msg-143571</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The stall characteristics are much the same (same airfoil, same stall characteristics).  The semi-taper wings have more wing area and a slightly higher aspect ratio.  The larger area slightly reduces the stall speed for a given weight and the higher aspect ratio (not much higher) slightly reduces the induced drag at speeds near stall (while increasing the parasite drag).  For the same reasons (larger wing and higher aspect ratio), the semi-taper wing has slightly better high altitude performance.  The differences are pretty much inconsequential.  In my opinion, the best wing is the one that has the best airframe and avionics attached to it.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143571#msg-143571</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:35:26 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Friends of the Earth demand AVGAS be banned</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143532/143570#msg-143570</link>
      <author>Leigh</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Virtually all things such as lead are naturally occurring and whether or not they are toxic depends on exposure levels.  It is not surprising that  a child living and sleeping very close to a major intersection was exposed to levels of airborne lead that could be harmful but the suggestion that the exposure due to overflying planes a thousand or more feet above people would expose them to harmful levels is hard to believe.  Our problem is that our extremely small consumption of fuel compared to the demand by cars and trucks doesn't provide much of an incentive for any of the bigger refiners to bother to spend much time and money to produce our fuel.   <br />
<br />
Having said that, I'm not suggesting that the regulators will not eventually ban all lead in our fuel so like all others here I do expect that alternates are being researched and hopefully they won't be too expensive or harmful to our engines.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143532/143570#msg-143570</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:04:22 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143569#msg-143569</link>
      <author>Rick T.</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Bout the safest thing you can do for the environment is to drink it.....]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143569#msg-143569</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:47:39 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Tire tube failures</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143275/143568#msg-143568</link>
      <author>ed dartford</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Dave Matlock...Unless you fly the plane very little premium tires, whose sidewalls last longer, are not a good deal.  If you replace tires because of tread wear the cheaper brands are fine. Retreads are the best value. Agree about multiple inflations.  I always bounce the partly-inflated tire a few times.<br />
<br />
Glen J...You note that improper installation is often the cause of tube failure.  How does the tube being new improve workmanship?<br />
And, the split wheel is the most dangerous aspect of tube/tire replacement.  Care must be taken not to pinch the tube between the wheel halves.<br />
<br />
Oh, and land on grass and your tires will last forever (almost).]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143275/143568#msg-143568</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:14:46 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Modifications] Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143567#msg-143567</link>
      <author>Jim Wells</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I believe the longer tapered wing has better high altitude performance and better stall characteristics.  I believe i have seen info along those lines over the years.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143567#msg-143567</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:50:12 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Modifications] Re: RMD and Knots 2 U wing tips with landing lights</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/68494/143566#msg-143566</link>
      <author>Dan Blumel</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Liz Wrote:<br />
------------------------------------------------------- <br />
&gt; Reflector design has a HUGE affect on light<br />
&gt; output.  We have tested some of the higher wattage<br />
&gt; systems and found no increase in light output<br />
&gt; (some were less) vs our 35w systems mainly because<br />
&gt; the reflectors were not optimized for HID lamps.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; We also sell the PowerPULSE light controller that<br />
&gt; allows wing tip lights to be flashed (together) or<br />
&gt; pulsed (side to side).<br />
<br />
Aviation Consumer Compared our 50 watt to 35 watt versions from Lopresti and the others a couple of years ago. Aviation Consumers called the difference between our 50 watt and all the others as &quot;Stupefyingly&quot; bright. Our 50 watt produces ~65% more light than any Lopresti 35 watt HID. Yes, reflector design and coating quality can have a hoge impact on output performance. We use premium reflectors.<br />
<br />
The powerpulse from Lopresti (same as MaxPulse) is NOT suitable for wig wag of HID because the 5 second warmup they offer is way too short. All HID requires 20-30 seconds of warmup before pulsing, so the plasma can reach steady state before pulsing. There are No exceptions to this fact. Only the 1 Hz or 60 PPM each channel (120 ppm both channels) is ok for HID. Do NOT use their other Powerpulse speeds. If these industry accepted facts are not followed bulb life will be cut by 1/2 or more. Early ballast failure is also likely.<br />
<br />
XeVision has a US patent on this warmup Pulsing of HID technology. Patent Awarded Nov. 2009]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/68494/143566#msg-143566</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:28:32 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Tire tube failures</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143275/143565#msg-143565</link>
      <author>Dave Matlock</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I use Goodyear Flight custon III's and as long as you don't have bad braking habits and flat spot your rubber, think the number of landings they give justifies their price.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143275/143565#msg-143565</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:04:39 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[For Sale / Wanted] Re: Price Reduction - Purchased Light Twin &amp; Must Sell 1975 Arrow II</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/3/143410/143564#msg-143564</link>
      <author>N3906X</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Edward, <br />
<br />
Thank you for your interest, I've sent the information to your personal e-mail.]]></description>
      <category>For Sale / Wanted</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/3/143410/143564#msg-143564</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:03:17 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Cherokee Seats</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143563/143563#msg-143563</link>
      <author>Ben R</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I own a 1973 Cherokee 140 that I also instruct in. The front seats seem to sit very low and I find that most of my students have a hard time getting a good view out front. I have flown several Cherokees of this same year model and the seats always seem to sit very low. On the other hand, we have owned several 65-67 model Cherokee 140s and 180s. The seats in these planes allow the pilot to sit higher and give a totally different view over the nose. Is the glareshield higher in the later models or do all Cherokee's of this age just have lower seats. I've thought about replacing the cushions with thicker foam but I'm still not sure if that would give me the lift I'm looking for. Does anyone else have this problem? Thanks in advance!<br />
<br />
Ben R.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143563/143563#msg-143563</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:24:31 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Political &amp; News Related Posts] Re: Bill Maher slams democrat impotence (except Edwards)</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143562#msg-143562</link>
      <author>manoffewwords</author>
      <description><![CDATA[[b]&quot;I wrote too much again, didn't I?&quot;<br />
[/b]<br />
<br />
Suggest you pick up a copy of &quot;Elements of Style&quot; By Strunk and White<br />
<br />
Strunk recommended that writers omit needless words. <br />
<br />
http://www.crockford.com/wrrrld/style.html<br />
<br />
mofw]]></description>
      <category>Political &amp; News Related Posts</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143562#msg-143562</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:19:20 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: IFR Training</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143561#msg-143561</link>
      <author>John Barton</author>
      <description><![CDATA[GM, Sorry for the confusion, I copied and pasted the reply late in the evening from another forum I posted on in February.  Should have made the correction before posting. Not enough hours in a day...<br />
<br />
I have and fly to our offices weekly, throughout the Northeast, Texas, Arkansas, among a few. The big difference now is I am doing it on my own without a corp pilot. The rating has been put to good use and certainly changed my business travel / life....One of the best things I've accomplished thus far. <br />
<br />
Learned yesterday my insurance has dropped almost in half from previous premiums. it just keeps getting better.. <br />
<br />
John B.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143561#msg-143561</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:55:36 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143560#msg-143560</link>
      <author>Ed Dartford</author>
      <description><![CDATA[So what do you do with the gas if you don't put it back in the tank?  <br />
Back in the day we just tossed it away.  But that's bad for the grass, or asphalt.  And it contaminates groundwater that flows off the tiedown area, and which is routinely tested by the EPA. They could shut us down if they found a &quot;problem&quot;.<br />
<br />
Unless I find water I return it to the tank. It's not about the cost of gas.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143560#msg-143560</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:15:40 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143559#msg-143559</link>
      <author>Rick T.</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I've returned fuel from a clean white bucket, thru a coffee filter inside a large funnel.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143559#msg-143559</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:02:16 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: IFR Training</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143558#msg-143558</link>
      <author>ed dartford</author>
      <description><![CDATA[GM...If you can always climb above the clouds the rule about not loging time on top as IFR is OK.  But the type of flying I have done involves lots of in and out of clowds, sometimes at night when you can't tell in from out, and it would be quite impractical to keep track of the different categories. So, I am probably guilty of another aviators sin.  (Put that on your list, PK).  For me the precise navigation and communication involved  are the chief challenges of IFR operations, and justify calling it IFR.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143378/143558#msg-143558</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:55:11 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143557#msg-143557</link>
      <author>Gimble</author>
      <description><![CDATA[JoeB Wrote:<br />
-------------------------------------------------------<br />
&gt; Glass would probably make<br />
&gt; inspection easier, but the plastic bucket is<br />
&gt; harder to break.  <br />
<br />
I went with glass because I couldn't find an appropriate gas can with a huge mouth, and I don't know my plastics enough to know what might break down under exposure to gasoline and introduce contaminants.<br />
<br />
However, on the asphalt, my one use of it made me worry about the concrete breaking the glass either through impact or the roughness of the ground if it were 'scooted' at all.<br />
<br />
I think I'll look into some kind of rubber backing I can put on the bottom of the pitcher (remarkably close to the beer pitchers Kathie referred to).  With that and those filters mentioned in this thread, I think I have a solution I can live with.<br />
<br />
With thanks, the 'other' Joe]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143557#msg-143557</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:47:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Crate and ship my Cherokee. Is it complex?</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143485/143556#msg-143556</link>
      <author>mcdgi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I don't know if you have spent much time in Kenya or flying there, my guess is you are taking your cherokee there, probably so.  <br />
<br />
But if not, I used to live there early 1980s, got my Kenyan pilot's license  on the strength of my FAA cert, and used to fly with the now defunct Nakuru Aero Club.  Flying over there back then was an extraordinary experience. In alot of ways, it was like flying here, take off when and where you want, no user fees, and generally the weather and scenery was spectacula. Upcountry destinations were journeys back in time and to another world.<br />
<br />
The scenery and the upcountry experience is still the same, but, flying is very restricted today.  The Aero Club of East Africa is a great source of information:<br />
<br />
http://www.aeroclubea.com/<br />
<br />
If you are not up to speed on what flying over there is like (or rather, what getting permission to go on a flight is like)  I would definitely get in touch with them and get a primer on the subject.<br />
<br />
The following is from one of the newsletters they sent me:<br />
<br />
&quot;Over the past three years, air operators and pilots at Wilson Airport have become used to the bureaucracy that is now associated with aviation in Kenya. Even little four-seater aircraft willingly 'taxi' to the Terminal for a &quot;security check&quot; by police. Pilots file a flight plan at a KCAA office, pay a Navigation Fee (even on VFR flights where they are &quot;doing the navigating&quot;!) to a different officer from the Kenya Revenue Authority, bring back the receipt to KCAA, and then give &quot;Passenger Manifests&quot; in quintuplicate to various seemingly interested parties, ranging from the Kenya Revenue Authority to the Kenya Airports Authority and from the Police to 'Security'. This process takes about 30 minutes to an hour, depending on the walking time involved from one's aircraft. It's a growth industry and many commercial operators now employ full-time staff to deal with this bureaucracy and to unburden pilots from this chore.<br />
 <br />
When pilots already thought it could not get much worse, a new &quot;player&quot; showed up at the scene. Recently, &quot;Kenya Customs&quot; officers have been harassing pilots for 'Manifest Forms', to the extent that overzealous uniformed officers forced pilots to 'shut down' their already started engines on the apron. The officers demanded &quot;Passenger Manifests&quot; and insisted on issuing a &quot;Clearance Number&quot; even on Domestic Flights, not only on &quot;Departure, but also on &quot;Arrival&quot;. To make matters worse, &quot;Passenger Manifests&quot; were demanded even if the aircraft carried no passengers.&quot;<br />
<br />
As for the Nakuru aerodrome I used to fly out of,  I heard this about it: &quot;Nakuru Aero Club was closed in 1986 or so. The Army decided it was a &quot;security risk&quot;. The building is still there, but it has been completed stripped and looted by the locals. So, only a shell remains. The Lanet airfield is still being used&quot;]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143485/143556#msg-143556</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:09:29 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143555#msg-143555</link>
      <author>ed dartford</author>
      <description><![CDATA[PaulR...I begin this routine after I am up several thousand feet so that switching back to the initial tank would be no problem.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143555#msg-143555</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:27:11 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Friends of the Earth demand AVGAS be banned</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143532/143554#msg-143554</link>
      <author>Jeff S</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Chill out folks. It's only a matter of time before the no-lead requirement becomes real but frankly, it's not that big a deal. I've seen lots of tests of new fuels that hold promise and should (hopefully) be produceable with no appreciable cost increase.<br />
<br />
I'm not saying Global Warming is caused by man, here, don't get me wrong. But lead has been proven in the long run to be damaging to human health, so at some point we're all going to have face the facts and just get on with things.]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143532/143554#msg-143554</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:03:16 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: Returning fuel to tank</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143553#msg-143553</link>
      <author>Kathie</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Hey, one of those polycarbonate beer pitchers would work great!  (along with the funnel)  <br />
<br />
Swipe one next time you're at your favourite beveraging establishment!]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143503/143553#msg-143553</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:49:47 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Maintenance] Re: carb heat cable</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/4/143472/143552#msg-143552</link>
      <author>8274xray</author>
      <description><![CDATA[piper owners society helped me searcch for one last year and found 3 available in varrious places at good price. I think all were servicable used, one I got looked like new.]]></description>
      <category>Maintenance</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/4/143472/143552#msg-143552</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:20:03 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Maintenance] Re: Lance Annual Inspection Costs</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/4/143238/143551#msg-143551</link>
      <author>Adam</author>
      <description><![CDATA[It sounds like it will be possible to get the inspection done for somewhere around 1500 or so.  What constitutes the other 4-5K?  What kind of repairs do are you finding that need to be done?  Are they necessary items affected the airworthiness of the airplane or things like new windows or other &quot;nice to have&quot; items?  Thanks!<br />
<br />
Adam]]></description>
      <category>Maintenance</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/4/143238/143551#msg-143551</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:06:26 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Modifications] Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143550#msg-143550</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The constant chord is faster, the semi-taper climbs a bit better.  The semi-taper is NOT a NASA redesign, both wings use the same airfoil,<br />
the 65[sub]2[/sub]-415.  From the outboard side of the fuel tanks inboard to the fuselage, the wings are identical both in physical size and shape.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143550#msg-143550</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:03:34 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Political &amp; News Related Posts] Re: Bill Maher slams democrat impotence (except Edwards)</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143549#msg-143549</link>
      <author>JTaylor</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Ken,<br />
<br />
I'm getting the vibe that no matter what I say, you'll sidestep my points.<br />
<br />
When I [b]do[/b] engage the issues, I'm chastized for writing a lot, and my points are ignored.<br />
<br />
And I [b]DID NOT SAY[/b] your sources are illegitimate or unauthorized. That [b]COMPLETELY MISSES MY POINT[/b].  Again, an example of my points being ignored or sidestepped.<br />
<br />
If I posted my opinions here, loaded with left-wing propaganda catch-phrases and terms, you'd be [b]COMPLETELY CORRECT[/b] to question the foundation of information I'm working off of, and if it's accurate.  That's what I'm doing with you- questioning the foundation of information you're drawing on.  I don't think we can have a straight discussion because you seem to have bitten off and swallowed the right-wing narrative, complete with catchphrases and terminology.  Your posts are rife with it.  <br />
<br />
I'm not going around and around with you anymore.  I write stuff here, and it's not even read or understood.<br />
<br />
I wrote too much again, didn't I?]]></description>
      <category>Political &amp; News Related Posts</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143549#msg-143549</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:00:04 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[General Discussion] Re: broken wheel pant bracket</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143244/143548#msg-143548</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Most likely, one of two things happened.  Either the three bolts on the inside of the wheel fairing loosened up, letting the fairing vibrate due to airload transients, thereby breaking the bracket due to fatigue, or the cotter pin that retains the collar pin was lost, letting the collar pin come out, at which point the outboard attachment loosens up, with the same results -- vibrating fairing breaks the bracket.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>General Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/1/143244/143548#msg-143548</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:56:35 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[Political &amp; News Related Posts] Re: Bill Maher slams democrat impotence (except Edwards)</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143547#msg-143547</link>
      <author>JTaylor</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Wow, my post was deleted, with nothing defamatory or rude in it.  It seems only the [b]conservative[/b] posts are safe here, and challenging anyone's conservative ideas is a no-no.<br />
<br />
Goodbye, Piper Owner.]]></description>
      <category>Political &amp; News Related Posts</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/35/141236/143547#msg-143547</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:42:26 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
