<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Modifications</title>
    <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/list/5</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Modifications ideas and help. 
Open to Public to Read | Open to Public to Post ]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:35:26 -0600</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:35:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <category>Modifications</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.25</generator>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143571#msg-143571</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The stall characteristics are much the same (same airfoil, same stall characteristics).  The semi-taper wings have more wing area and a slightly higher aspect ratio.  The larger area slightly reduces the stall speed for a given weight and the higher aspect ratio (not much higher) slightly reduces the induced drag at speeds near stall (while increasing the parasite drag).  For the same reasons (larger wing and higher aspect ratio), the semi-taper wing has slightly better high altitude performance.  The differences are pretty much inconsequential.  In my opinion, the best wing is the one that has the best airframe and avionics attached to it.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143571#msg-143571</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:35:26 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143567#msg-143567</link>
      <author>Jim Wells</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I believe the longer tapered wing has better high altitude performance and better stall characteristics.  I believe i have seen info along those lines over the years.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143567#msg-143567</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:50:12 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RMD and Knots 2 U wing tips with landing lights</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/68494/143566#msg-143566</link>
      <author>Dan Blumel</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Liz Wrote:<br />
------------------------------------------------------- <br />
&gt; Reflector design has a HUGE affect on light<br />
&gt; output.  We have tested some of the higher wattage<br />
&gt; systems and found no increase in light output<br />
&gt; (some were less) vs our 35w systems mainly because<br />
&gt; the reflectors were not optimized for HID lamps.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; We also sell the PowerPULSE light controller that<br />
&gt; allows wing tip lights to be flashed (together) or<br />
&gt; pulsed (side to side).<br />
<br />
Aviation Consumer Compared our 50 watt to 35 watt versions from Lopresti and the others a couple of years ago. Aviation Consumers called the difference between our 50 watt and all the others as &quot;Stupefyingly&quot; bright. Our 50 watt produces ~65% more light than any Lopresti 35 watt HID. Yes, reflector design and coating quality can have a hoge impact on output performance. We use premium reflectors.<br />
<br />
The powerpulse from Lopresti (same as MaxPulse) is NOT suitable for wig wag of HID because the 5 second warmup they offer is way too short. All HID requires 20-30 seconds of warmup before pulsing, so the plasma can reach steady state before pulsing. There are No exceptions to this fact. Only the 1 Hz or 60 PPM each channel (120 ppm both channels) is ok for HID. Do NOT use their other Powerpulse speeds. If these industry accepted facts are not followed bulb life will be cut by 1/2 or more. Early ballast failure is also likely.<br />
<br />
XeVision has a US patent on this warmup Pulsing of HID technology. Patent Awarded Nov. 2009]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/68494/143566#msg-143566</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:28:32 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143550#msg-143550</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The constant chord is faster, the semi-taper climbs a bit better.  The semi-taper is NOT a NASA redesign, both wings use the same airfoil,<br />
the 65[sub]2[/sub]-415.  From the outboard side of the fuel tanks inboard to the fuselage, the wings are identical both in physical size and shape.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143550#msg-143550</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:03:34 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pa 180 verses Pa 181</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143538#msg-143538</link>
      <author>Bob Peniston</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok Fans: I got the age old question in Piper circles. Which one is faster the old constant cord Piper wing or the N.A.S.A. redesigned taper wing? <br />
<br />
                              Bob]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143538/143538#msg-143538</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:41:01 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are gap seals worthwhile?</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143396#msg-143396</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[2 knots is about right.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143396#msg-143396</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:58:14 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flap hinge fairings</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143360#msg-143360</link>
      <author>Robin Thomas</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Flap hinge fairings:<br />
<br />
The only aluminum ones are Laminar Flow Systems (me). We have been making them since 1983, and they are guaranteed for life. They never have to be removed for any type of service. You can see pics at www.laminarflowsystems.com<br />
<br />
K2U also makes hinge fairings, but they are made of plastic, and are one piece. LoPresti makes fiberglass ones similar to LFS, except they have to be removed from time to time.<br />
<br />
Claims vary, but in my opinion, anything over 2 knots is bogus.<br />
<br />
Give me a call or email: 386 451 1957 robin.gt@gmail.com<br />
<br />
<br />
Regards<br />
<br />
Robin<br />
President<br />
Laminar Flow Systems Inc.  also an Arrow owner!]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143360#msg-143360</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:29:09 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RE: Are gap seals worthwhile?</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143357#msg-143357</link>
      <author>magman</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I think GB said Archer Wing Extensions.<br />
<br />
The 180, Challenger &amp; Archer are ALL Hershey -Bars.<br />
<br />
It is the Archer 2 that went to a tapered wing.<br />
<br />
The Challenger utilized a &quot;riveted - on &quot; Wing Extension&quot;.<br />
<br />
Maybe about 16 inches?<br />
<br />
The other mentioned item was &quot;235 Stab Tips&quot;.<br />
<br />
Seems like Isham Mods.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143357#msg-143357</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:11:15 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PA31 Camera Hatch STC</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/46020/143347#msg-143347</link>
      <author>Mike</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Does anyone know who sells PA31310 STC's for a 20 inch diameter camera hatch.<br />
<br />
thanks<br />
<br />
Mike]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/46020/143347#msg-143347</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:01:57 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flap hinge fairings</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143345#msg-143345</link>
      <author>hcaud1</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm looking for flap hinge fairings for a 1972 Arrow.  Any help appreciated.<br />
<br />
Hugh]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/31797/143345#msg-143345</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:43:43 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lance Turbo Removal</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143232/143293#msg-143293</link>
      <author>Robin Thomas</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Adam,<br />
<br />
I flew quite  few turbo Lances and normally aspirated Lances when I was based in the U.S Virgin islands. My customers would normally fly them down from Florida, stopping on the way, then I would modify them and fly them back non stop.(1000 statute miles)<br />
<br />
I felt that the turbo Lance was the best travelling machine ever. I was able to fly at over 160 knots burning only 11 gallons per hour, and never had any problem with overheating, although we are talking Caribbean temperatures.<br />
<br />
The secret, in my opinion, is to climb at much higher than book speeds to keep the engine cool, and to cruise at 65% power or less, leaned well lean of peak. If you do that, your engine will last just as long as a normally aspirated one plus you will have great altitude performance.<br />
<br />
If you would like more details, please email me at robin.gt@gmail.com, and I'll be happy to help.<br />
<br />
Robin Thomas<br />
Laminar Flow Systems Inc.<br />
(www.laminarflowsystems.com)]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143232/143293#msg-143293</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:43:36 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weight bearing capacity</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143274#msg-143274</link>
      <author>PilotKris</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Or you do like I did, use TLAR engineering (That Looks About Right), build it and test it. The difference in weight between a grossly overbuilt mount and one that just barely does the job is probably negligible. The load factors are listed in the FARs (16g forward and 5g vertical if memory serves). Make sure you document the test results in your form 337 submission.<br />
<br />
Fabrication techniques (bend radius, hole spacing, no sharp inside corners etc.) will also have a huge effect on strength. AC43.13 is a great resource.<br />
<br />
Or you can hire a DER to design one. I have a feeling that the mount won't be much lighter but your wallet sure will...<br />
<br />
<br />
PilotKris]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143274#msg-143274</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:56:19 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lance Turbo Removal</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143232/143232#msg-143232</link>
      <author>adam</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I read on someones post regarding the Lopresti Howl Cowl that they had the installers remove the turbo from the aircraft.  Is this really possible or am I reading that wrong?  I am concerned about the turbo as it seems all I hear about it high CHT's and short lived cylinders.  I appreciate your input on this and look forward to hearing back.<br />
<br />
Adam]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143232/143232#msg-143232</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:56:03 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weight bearing capacity</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143196#msg-143196</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[No, because the control criteria are going have more to do with the edge connnections, rivet shear, rivet tension, hole spacing, things like that.  Basically (as an oversimplification), you do a tentative design, compute the stresses, and use the results to modify the design as required to get the safety factor you want.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143196#msg-143196</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:19:55 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orange Peel and Gloss Delta E Purpose.</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/105017/143187#msg-143187</link>
      <author>Marc delos Santos</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Could you please explain to me the primary purpose of using Orange Peel and Gloss Delta E in Aircraft Inspection after painting, Please include the normal value.. the minimum and maximum for Orange Peel and Gloss Delta E. <br />
<br />
Looking forward hearing from you. Your kind and attention on this matter is very much appreciated.thank you.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/105017/143187#msg-143187</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:48:54 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weight bearing capacity</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143179#msg-143179</link>
      <author>PaulB</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Designing a support structure for a remote mount avionics box. The 43.13 talks about building a sample test article for load testing. Fair enough. But instead of over-building, or creating multiple, increasingly stronger, samples, it would be nice to have an idea of the strength of materials at the outset.<br />
<br />
Is there a readily available source that would provide information about the load bearing capability of a 12&quot; square (or any other defined area) section of 2024 T3 in .025 vs .032 vs .090? Thanks.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/143179/143179#msg-143179</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:02:04 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saratoga NX - like a brand new airplane!</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/143073#msg-143073</link>
      <author>PilotKris</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I don't get the gigantic side bolsters on the seats. They put them on sports cars because of the tremendous lateral G-forces the driver and passengers are subjected to. <br />
<br />
But an airplane always has zero side loads as long as the pilot keeps the ball centered...<br />
<br />
PilotKris]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/143073#msg-143073</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:37:39 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saratoga NX - like a brand new airplane!</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/143027#msg-143027</link>
      <author>glenn j</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The last I knew, the plane was still listed in experimental because he hadn't received the STC for the conversion.<br />
<br />
It's a one-of-a-kind to show off the avionics shop's capabilities.<br />
<br />
I too would buy a newer plane with most of that already installed, for the same price. The 2003-2005 6X is the same price, or less if it has steam gauges. Even so, you can put a G600 into a 6X and be way ahead of this NX.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/143027#msg-143027</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:33:37 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142948#msg-142948</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I've been flying my Cherokee 150C mostly off grass strips for more than 30 years now.  I prefer grass.  However, over the years, most of my time is in a J3, and in it most of my landings and takeoffs have been off-field entirely, generally on riverine sand.  I figured I'd let you find out about the spelling for yourself -- Art isn't particular what you call him, long as you do call him :-)<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142948#msg-142948</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:33:14 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142919#msg-142919</link>
      <author>magman</author>
      <description><![CDATA[First thing I discovered at the site was that I was misspelling his<br />
<br />
 name!<br />
<br />
Really liked what is there.<br />
<br />
My take is you really increase the utility of your aircraft by <br />
<br />
utilizing grass strips.<br />
<br />
Most &quot;Collapsible Gear&quot; aircraft have a small nosewheel &amp; a lot of weight on it.<br />
<br />
So they have to go 25 miles from the destination to find a paved strip.<br />
<br />
With your Cherokee ( and all 6:00 x 6 tires)  you can land on grass <br />
<br />
most days.<br />
<br />
When the field is soft Mooneys have to go elsehere.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142919#msg-142919</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:36:21 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142915#msg-142915</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[.....A Prop pitch increase might increase cruise speed but might have an effect on acceleration. <br />
<br />
It will slow down the acceleration, although in back to back comparisons using the same pilot and passenger in both planes, my 150C (160hp) with 62&quot; prop gets off the ground shorter and climbs faster than a 180C carrying the same payload.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142915#msg-142915</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:36:56 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saratoga NX - like a brand new airplane!</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/142911#msg-142911</link>
      <author>JoeB</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Sure looks nice.  What they don't say is what the upgrades do to useful load.<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Joe]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/142911#msg-142911</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:27:48 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142897#msg-142897</link>
      <author>magman</author>
      <description><![CDATA[JimC It's not really that short ; maybe 1800? <br />
<br />
Probably 1400 &quot;useable&quot;&amp; is 1 way IN other way OUT.<br />
<br />
Adding to the joy is that it also has wires at both ends.<br />
<br />
Actually not that difficult but INTIMIDATING.<br />
<br />
At lift -off the VSI shows a descent.<br />
<br />
Most stock aircraft do ok , but you really don't want to give up anything either.<br />
<br />
I don't think Travelers or Yankees would do well here.<br />
<br />
A  Prop pitch increase might increase cruise speed but might have an effect on acceleration.<br />
<br />
<br />
Think I'll check out AM's site again.<br />
<br />
Haven't been there in a while.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142897#msg-142897</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:16:35 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142870#msg-142870</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[AJ, you should be able to download the service manual -- I did, and it's easier to use than my paper manual.  I've seen them at several locations on the web.<br />
<br />
The first thing you need to do is rig the plane to stock neutral and fly it, then one flap to get rid of the heavy wing (if you still have one after rigging neutral), then if you so desire -- rig both flaps and ailerons 2 degrees up from that appropriately rigged condition.<br />
<br />
Magman, Art flys his two Cherokees off a 600 foot grass strip that he's built in his back yard.  He does have about 200 feet of asphalt about 12 feet wide that he uses to get rolling and for braking.  He flys in in one direction, and out the other.  Consequently, he's as interested in short field as he is in extra speed.  How short is your 'somewhat short' runway?  If very short, sounds like you're one way in and the other out as well.<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142870#msg-142870</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:47:22 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142863#msg-142863</link>
      <author>AJDrac</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm looking to pick up a service manual this week.  I never had intentions of doing any of this beforehand, I'm just trying to get advice on what the best way to proceed with this would be.  I have already talked to the A&amp;P/AI on field here and he will do it, but doesn't have much experience with Cherokees, hence why I'm trying to get some information about the process myself to ensure it is done correctly (I plan on being there and working with him on this).  Also, don't worry about offending me, it's hard to do.<br />
<br />
I was going to wait on the next annual to do any rigging that requires panel removal, but if it's particularly easy and not time consuming to do it seems it would make little difference and I might as well get it done sooner rather than later.<br />
<br />
On the subject of a service manual, anyone know a good source for one?  I've had some difficulty locating it (not used to dealing with documents I can't download!).<br />
<br />
Thanks for everything so far.  I consider myself reasonably handy with tools but have little experience working with my airplane so far, so all of you have been a big help getting me started.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142863#msg-142863</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:33:51 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142856#msg-142856</link>
      <author>magman</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm rather impressed with what Art M. is doing.<br />
<br />
My thoughts are more focused on the &quot;other end of the spectrum&quot;.<br />
<br />
I live about 150 yds from a somewhat short &quot;one-way&quot; grass runway.<br />
<br />
About 100 ft difference &quot;Uphill&quot; vs &quot;Downhill&quot;.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142856#msg-142856</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:25:07 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saratoga NX - like a brand new airplane!</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/142854#msg-142854</link>
      <author>PaulR</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Yum Yum...Nice restoration but 395K as they said Ouch, you could get a really nice and newer Toga 2000  model with all the bells and whistles for 300 K and 750-1000 hours.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142557/142854#msg-142854</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:04:23 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142850#msg-142850</link>
      <author>JimC</author>
      <description><![CDATA[....Is the stock nose wheel pant worthless as well as the mains?<br />
<br />
They're not worthless.  If you install all three, you'll pick up about 3 knots.<br />
<br />
At risk of offending you, you need the help of an AP/IA to accomplish this rerigging.  And I get the impression that you don't have a parts manual or service manual.  Without them, there isn't anything you can do to address the rigging.<br />
<br />
Re achievable cruise speeds, my Cherokee 150C (160 hp) currently cruises at about 135 knots at 7500-8000 feet when lightly loaded (me and about 36 gallons of fuel).  Heavy and down low, I don't do that well in cruise.  Down low, my top speed in level flight is about 141 knots at 2790 rpm with 62&quot; pitch.  At the moment, my pitch limit is in making minimum static rpm in the wintertime.  I think I'm probably 10 or 12 knots away from achieving potential Cherokee cruise speeds.<br />
<br />
Magman, it's possible that I may have some additional information about Art's thinking. He and I are old friends, talk several times a month, and visit about once a year (we live in different parts of the country).<br />
<br />
JimC]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142850#msg-142850</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:37:23 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142843#msg-142843</link>
      <author>PilotKris</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Just checking the obvious: Are you leaning for Best Power (Max RPM)?<br />
<br />
You mentioned wanting to re-pitch higher so are you hitting redline before WOT? If you are, flying higher were you can fly WOT (at Best Power) and benefit from higher TAS might be an alternative to re-pitching the prop.<br />
<br />
I echo what everyone else said, if you've got a &quot;heavy&quot; wing, your rigging is out and is certainly costing you speed.<br />
<br />
PilotKris]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142843#msg-142843</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:25:53 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Airspeed Discrepencies, Speed Mods</title>
      <link>http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142841#msg-142841</link>
      <author>magman</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Flap &amp; aileron cables are independent of each other.<br />
<br />
Aileron bellcranks are located just forward of the inboard end of the <br />
<br />
aileron. The pushrod is about a foot long. There is an access panel <br />
<br />
there ( 4 screws I think).<br />
<br />
&quot;When your shoes are off is also a good time to change yours socks?&quot;<br />
<br />
To me it makes sense to rig flaps &amp; ailerons at the same time.<br />
<br />
There is time lost every time you start another job.<br />
<br />
If you have fixture , tensiometer , etc already why not?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Approx .060 steel , alum or ? will work for the Bellcrank Tool.<br />
<br />
The Bellcrank Tool has plans in the Service Manual.<br />
<br />
Anyone that DOES NOT have this in some form should put the tools away <br />
<br />
right now.]]></description>
      <category>Modifications</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.piperowner.org/read/5/142742/142841#msg-142841</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:13:10 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
